Boosting ESG Performance: Overcoming Collusion Among Entrepreneurial Family and Institutional Shareholders

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v7i1.452

Keywords:

ESG, Multiple Large Shareholders, Entrepreneurial Family Shareholders, Institutional Shareholders

Abstract

This study addresses the debate on the role of Multiple Large Shareholders (MLS) in influencing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance in family-controlled firms across ASEAN. It explores whether MLS identity creates a collusion effect or monitoring effect on ESG outcomes. Using unbalanced panel regression with 672 firm-year observations from publicly listed firms in ASEAN-6 (2015-2022), this study evaluates the impact of MLS identity on ESG performance. The findings indicate that MLS mainly exert a collusion effect, prioritizing private gains over stakeholder interests. Institutional investors as second-largest shareholders often misuse private ESG information rather than ensuring accountability, amplifying the collusion effect. These results contrast with prior studies highlighting MLS monitoring role in other regions. This study emphasizes the need for stronger governance in ASEAN to address MLS collusion and improve ESG performance. Global investors and policymakers must advocate for sustainable practices and transparency in family-controlled firms. The insights advance discussions on ownership structures and their implications for corporate sustainability in emerging markets.

References

F. Barbera, H. X. Shi, A. Agarwal, and M. Edwards, “The family that prays together stays together: Toward a process model of religious value transmission in family firms,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 661–673, 2020.

O. Pileckait˙e and R. Subaˇcien˙e, “Integrating sustainability into corporate financial management,” Theoretical economics letters., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 915–950, 2024.

S. Boubaker, R. Manita, and W. Rouatbi, “Large shareholders, control contestability and firm productive efficiency,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 296, pp. 591–614, 2021.

S. Chen, Y. Wang, K. Albitar, and Z. Huang, “Does ownership concentration affect corporate environmental responsibility engagement? the mediating role of corporate leverage,” Borsa Istanbul Review, vol. 21, pp. S13–S24, 2021.

W. Choi, C. Y. Chung, M. K. Rabarison, and K. Wang, “Related party transactions and corporate environmental responsibility,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 46, p. 102490, 2022.

S. Wahyuningsih, A. Sutarman, I. N. Hikam et al., “Understanding purposeful leadership in entrepreneurial contexts: A bibliometric analysis,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 213–230, 2024.

F. Hern´andez-Perlines and D. Ribeiro-Soriano, “Analysis of the internationalization of the family business from the approach of entrepreneurial orientation,” in Research Handbook on Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Family Firms. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, pp. 298–324.

M. R. DesJardine, M. Zhang, and W. Shi, “How shareholders impact stakeholder interests: A review and map for future research,” Journal of management, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 400–429, 2023.

O. Hawn, A. K. Chatterji, and W. Mitchell, “Do investors actually value sustainability? new evidence from investor reactions to the dow jones sustainability index (djsi),” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 949–976, 2018.

R. Sivaraman, M.-H. Lin, M. I. C. Vargas, S. I. S. Al-Hawary, U. Rahardja, F. A. H. Al-Khafaji, E. V. Golubtsova, and L. Li, “Multi-objective hybrid system development: To increase the performance of diesel/photovoltaic/wind/battery system.” Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, vol. 11, no. 3, 2024.

W. Huang, Y. Luo, X. Wang, and L. Xiao, “Controlling shareholder pledging and corporate esg behavior,” Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 61, p. 101655, 2022.

T. Ingram, K. Bratnicka-My´sliwiec, T. Kra´snicka, and I. Steinerowska-Streb, “Entrepreneurial orientation as a determinant of sustainable performance in polish family and non-family organizations,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 24, p. 16393, 2022.

D. Seckin-Halac, E. Erdener-Acar, and Y. Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu, “Ownership and corporate social responsibility:” the power of the female touch”,” European Management Journal, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 695–709, 2021.

A. Ruangkanjanases, A. Khan, O. Sivarak, U. Rahardja, and S.-C. Chen, “Modeling the consumers’ flow experience in e-commerce: The integration of ecm and tam with the antecedents of flow experience,” SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 21582440241258595, 2024.

H. Tang, “The effect of esg performance on corporate innovation in china: The mediating role of financial constraints and agency cost,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 3769, 2022.

L. Wang, X. Fan, and H. Zhuang, “Esg disclosure facilitator: How do the multiple large shareholders affect firms’ esg disclosure? evidence from china,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 11, p. 1063501, 2023.

L. Zhang and B. Li, “Mutual supervision or conspiracy? the incentive effect of multiple large shareholders on audit quality requirements,” International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 83, p. 102274, 2022.

R. Zhang and W. Fu, “Multiple large shareholders and corporate environmental performance,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 51, p. 103487, 2023.

D. Wang, H. He, and C. Wei, “Cellular and potential molecular mechanisms underlying transovarial transmission of the obligate symbiont sulcia in cicadas,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 836–852, 2023.

E. Marti, M. Fuchs, M. R. DesJardine, R. Slager, and J.-P. Gond, “The impact of sustainable investing: A multidisciplinary review,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2181–2211, 2024.

G. S. Putra, I. I. Maulana, A. D. Chayo, M. I. Haekal, R. Syaharani et al., “Pengukuran efektivitas platform e-learning dalam pembelajaran teknik informatika di era digital,” Jurnal MENTARI: Manajemen, Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2024.

N. Lu, T. L. Hall, J. R. Sukovich, S. W. Choi, J. Snell, N. McDannold, and Z. Xu, “Two-step aberration correction: application to transcranial histotripsy,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 67, no. 12, p. 125009, 2022.

J. Zhang, Y. Pan, W. Wang, Z. Shi, Z. Zhang, Z. Fu, Q. Cao, Y. Tian, Y. Zhu, X. Liu et al., “Potential benefits of variable rate nitrogen topdressing strategy coupled with zoning technique: A case study in a town-scale rice production system,” European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 155, p. 127132, 2024.

U. Rusilowati, H. R. Ngemba, R. W. Anugrah, A. Fitriani, and E. D. Astuti, “Leveraging ai for superior efficiency in energy use and development of renewable resources such as solar energy, wind, and bioenergy,” International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 114–120, 2024.

F. Alfiana, N. Khofifah, T. Ramadhan, N. Septiani, W. Wahyuningsih, N. N. Azizah, and N. Ramadhona, “Apply the search engine optimization (seo) method to determine website ranking on search engines,” International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–73, 2023.

I. Handayani, D. Apriani, M. Mulyati, N. A. Yusuf, and A. R. A. Zahra, “A survey on user experience of blockchain transactions: Security and adaptability issues,” Blockchain Frontier Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 80–88, 2023.

Y. Zhang, L. Chen, W. Guo, C. Zhou, and Z. Li, “The variability of no2 concentrations over china based on satellite and influencing factors analysis during 2019–2021,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 12, p. 1267627, 2024.

D. Bennet, S. A. Anjani, O. P. Daeli, D. Martono, and C. S. Bangun, “Predictive analysis of startup ecosystems: Integration of technology acceptance models with random forest techniques,” CORISINTA, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 70–79, 2024.

K. Liu, S. Dong, and M. Han, “Exploring the impact of green innovation on carbon emission intensity in chinese metropolitan areas,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 156, p. 111115, 2023.

F. S. Putri, H. R. Ngemba, S. Hendra, and W. Wirdayanti, “Sistem layanan ujian psikotes sim menggunakan computer based test berbasis website: Sim psychological test service system using computer based test based on website,” Technomedia Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 92–104, 2024.

S. E. Hawn, E. J. Wolf, Z. Neale, and M. W. Miller, “Conceptualizing traumatic stress and the structure of posttraumatic psychopathology through the lenses of rdoc and hitop,” Clinical psychology review, vol. 95, p. 102177, 2022.

S. Pelacani, M. Maerker, S. Tommasini, and S. Moretti, “Combining biodiversity and geodiversity on landscape scale: A novel approach using rare earth elements and spatial distribution models in an agricultural mediterranean landscape,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 158, p. 111583, 2024.

T. F. Yihun, B. A. Aragaw, A. A. Tsegaye, M. Tefera, and M. M. Ambo, “A highly sensitive and selective electrochemical sensor based on polythiourea modified glassy carbon electrode for detecting fenitrothion in vegetables,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, p. 100754, 2024.

M. Irawan and Z. A. Tyas, “Desain asset game android komodo isle berbasis 2 dimensi,” ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2024.

Q. Guo, Z. He, and Z. Wang, “Simulating daily pm2. 5 concentrations using wavelet analysis and artificial neural network with remote sensing and surface observation data,” Chemosphere, vol. 340, p. 139886, 2023.

B. Any, S. Four, and C. Tariazela, “Technology integration in tourism management: Enhancing the visitor experience,” Startupreneur Business Digital (SABDA Journal), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 81–88, 2024.

C. Wang, F.-Y. Chung, C.-C. Lin, J. C. Gibson, S. McGuire, A. V. Suarez, and J. Billen, “The spongiform tissue in strumigenys ants contains exocrine glands,” Arthropod Structure & Development, vol. 73, p. 101246, 2023.

J. Huang, J. Liu, R. Tian, K. Liu, P. Zhuang, H. T. Sherman, C. Budjan, M. Fong, M.-S. Jeong, and X.-J. Kong, “A next generation sequencing-based protocol for screening of variants of concern in autism spectrum disorder,” Cells, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 10, 2021.

S. Boubaker, A. Cellier, R. Manita, and A. Saeed, “Does corporate social responsibility reduce financial distress risk?” Economic Modelling, vol. 91, pp. 835–851, 2020.

F. Jiang, W. Cai, X. Wang, and B. Zhu, “Multiple large shareholders and corporate investment: Evidence from china,” Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 50, pp. 66–83, 2018.

M. Bueno-Garcia, A. Ortiz-Perez, and E. Mellado-Garcia, “Shareholders’ environmental profile and its impact on firm’s environmental proactivity: An institutional approach,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 374–387, 2021.

C. Flammer, M. W. Toffel, and K. Viswanathan, “Shareholder activism and firms’ voluntary disclosure of climate change risks,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1850–1879, 2021.

T. Chen, H. Dong, and C. Lin, “Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 483–504, 2020.

M. Ghaly, V. A. Dang, and K. Stathopoulos, “Institutional investors’ horizons and corporate employment decisions,” Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 64, p. 101634, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-17

How to Cite

Geraldina, I., Muktiyanto, A., & Rahardja, U. (2025). Boosting ESG Performance: Overcoming Collusion Among Entrepreneurial Family and Institutional Shareholders. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), 7(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v7i1.452

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>