Intrapreneurial Factors Influencing Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in Mobile Brigade Corps
Article Sidebar
-
Intrapreneurial Factors, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Empowering Leadership, Leader Member Exchange, Sustainable Institutions
Abstract
The Mobile Brigade Corps of the Indonesian National Police carries strategic responsibilities that require personnel to demonstrate strong organizational citizenship behaviour supported by intrapreneurial attributes. Intrapreneurial factors within public security institutions are increasingly important to enhance adaptability innovation and sustainable organizational performance in line with the Sustainable Development Goals particularly SDGs 8 on decent work and SDGs 16 on strong institutions. This study aims to examine the influence of intrapreneurial related factors namely perceived organizational support empowering leadership and proactive personality on organizational citizenship behaviour with leader member exchange as a mediating variable. A quantitative approach was employed using a survey of 8020 Mobile Brigade Corps personnel with 367 respondents selected through simple random sampling. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS version 24. The results indicate that perceived organizational support empowering leadership and proactive personality significantly influence organizational citizenship behaviour both directly and indirectly through leader member exchange. The mediating role of leader member exchange strengthens the relationship between intrapreneurial factors and extra role behaviour. The findings highlight the importance of fostering an intrapreneurial environment within public security organizations to promote voluntary and proactive employee behaviour. This study contributes to organizational development strategies that support institutional effectiveness sustainability and the achievement of SDGs oriented governance.
Full text article
References
[1] I. Kamoga, S. Nantamu, L. Matagi, and J. Nansamba, “The mediational role of task performance in the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behaviour among secondary school teachers,” European Journal of Business and Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 30–40, 2022.
[2] R. Hariani, “Pengaruh servant leadership, perceived organizational support dan well-being terhadap organizational citizenship behavior bank syariah indonesia kantor cabang bireuen simpang iv,” Ph.D. dissertation, Universitas Malikussaleh, 2024.
[3] J. Siswanto, V. A. Goeltom, I. N. Hikam, E. A. Lisangan, and A. Fitriani, “Market trend analysis and data-based decision making in increasing business competitiveness,” Sundara Advanced Research on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2025.
[4] ˙I. Limon, “Relationship between empowering leadership and teachers’ job performance: organizational commitment as mediator,” Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 16–41, 2022.
[5] A. S. Pratama, A. R. Sridadi, A. Eliyana, R. D. Anggraini, and N. L. M. Kamil, “A systematic review of proactive work behavior: Future research recommendation,” The Journal of Behavioral Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 136–151, 2023.
[6] N. Rehman, A. Mahmood, M. Ibtasam, S. A. Murtaza, N. Iqbal, and E. Moln´ar, “The psychology of resistance to change: the antidotal effect of organizational justice, support and leader-member exchange,” Frontiers in psychology, vol. 12, p. 678952, 2021.
[7] D. E. E. Saputra, V. Maulida Rahma, A. Eliyana, A. S. Pratama, R. D. Anggraini, N. L. M. Kamil, and I. Ismail, “Do system quality and information quality affect job performance? the mediation role of users’ perceptions,” Plos one, vol. 18, no. 6, p. e0285293, 2023.
[8] Q. Aini, D. Manongga, U. Rahardja, I. Sembiring, and Y.-M. Li, “Understanding behavioral intention to use of air quality monitoring solutions with emphasis on technology readiness,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 5079–5099, 2025.
[9] A. Simanjuntak, A. Sutarman, S. A. Anjani, and A. Nuche, “Integrating artificial intelligence in e-learning for organizational well-being through orange technology mapping,” IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2025.
[10] J. Sun, W.-D. Li, Y. Li, R. C. Liden, S. Li, and X. Zhang, “Unintended consequences of being proactive? linking proactive personality to coworker envy, helping, and undermining, and the moderating role of prosocial motivation.” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 106, no. 2, p. 250, 2021.
[11] T.-J. Wu, K.-S. Yuan, and D. C. Yen, “Leader-member exchange, turnover intention and presenteeism–the moderated mediating effect of perceived organizational support,” Current Psychology, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 4873–4884, 2023.
[12] “Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions,” https://globalgoals.org/goals/16-peace-justice-and-strong-institutions/, Global Goals, 2025, promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and
build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. [Online]. Available: https://globalgoals.org/goals/16-peace-justice-and-strong-institutions/
[13] M. Firdaus, A. Eliyana, A. S. Pratama, A. Cahyani, and N. L. M. Kamil, “Continuance of organizational commitment among flight attendants as an intervening variable to job performance,” Problems and Perspectives in Management, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 507, 2022.
[14] P. C. Neves, A. Palma-Moreira, C. Andrade, and M. Au-Yong-Oliveira, “Organizational citizenship behavior: adaptation and validation of the ocb scale ccoe-r,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, p. 1475011, 2024.
[15] E. D. Almer, N. H. Cannon, and J. Kremin, “The impact of supervisor relationships on auditor turnover intentions using leader-member exchange theory,” Behavioral Research in Accounting, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2023.
[16] S. Hidayat, A. Eliyana, A. S. Pratama, A. P. Emur, and B. K. Nugraha, “Building creativity in the television industry: The mediating role of meaning of work,” Problems and Perspectives in Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 347–355, 2023.
[17] K. A. Dahleez, M. Aboramadan, and N. Abu sharikh, “Empowering leadership and healthcare workers performance outcomes in times of crisis: The mediating role of safety climate,” Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 401–421, 2022.
[18] S. Hidayat, Z. Febrianto, A. Eliyana, U. Purwohedi, R. D. Anggraini, A. P. Emur, and M. Zahar, “Proactive personality and organizational support in television industry: Their roles in creativity,” Plos one, vol. 18, no. 1, p. e0280003, 2023.
[19] D. Chen, Y. Zhang, A. B. Ahmad, and B. Liu, “How to fuel public employees’ change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A two-wave moderated mediation study,” Review of Public Personnel Administration, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 185–208, 2023.
[20] S. Andhella, H. Djajadikerta, and M. Y. Marjuka, “Technopreneurship in pro-environmental behavior for sustainable carbon emission reduction in central kalimantan,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 254–269, 2024.
[21] M. Algarni and Y. Kasib, “The impact of leader member exchange (lmx) theory on employee turnover intention: an empirical study of employees at the ministry of hajj and umrah in saudi arabia,” Public Administration Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–60, 2023.
[22] D. Wang and X. Chen, “Use of leader–member exchange theory to promote the project governance of construction project contractors,” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 209–231, 2023.
[23] S. Purnama, C. S. Bangun, and E. P. Mahadewi, “Predicting consumer purchase intention in personal shopper services using big data analytics and sem,” International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management (IJCITSM), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 105–119, 2025.
[24] J. Ng, K. Wah, M. Fitriana, and T. Arumugam, “Assumptions for structure equation modeling (sem), normality of data distribution analysis & model fit measures,” Normality of Data Distribution Analysis & Model Fit Measures, 2023.
[25] D. Goretzko, K. Siemund, and P. Sterner, “Evaluating model fit of measurement models in confirmatory factor analysis,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 123–144, 2024.
[26] W. Sejati and T. T. Akbar, “Optimization study of cropping pattern in the klakah irrigation area, lumajang regency, using linear programming,” ADI Journal on Recent Innovation, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 136–145, 2024.
[27] G. Gusmanida, H. Sujati, and H. Herwin, “Testing the construct validity and reliability of the student learning motivation scale using confirmatory factor analysis (cfa),” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 4227–4234, 2024.
[28] F. Fajrianthi et al., “The role of proactive personality to explaining the effect of perceived organizational support and empowering leadership on employee voice,” Psikostudia: Jurnal Psikologi, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 166–173, 2024.
[29] S. C. Nwokolo, A. U. Obiwulu, and J. C. Ogbulezie, “Machine learning and analytical model hybridization to assess the impact of climate change on solar pv energy production,” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, vol. 130, p. 103389, 2023.
[30] N. A. Setyawan and B. Y. Wibowo, “Improving business productivity performance through entrepreneurship training and entrepreneurship self-efficacy,” Jurnal Ekuilnomi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2023.
[31] A. Alshaabani, F. Naz, R. Magda, and I. Rudn´ak, “Impact of perceived organizational support on ocb in the time of covid-19 pandemic in hungary: employee engagement and affective commitment as mediators,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 14, p. 7800, 2021.
[32] L. Meria, C. Yohana, and U. Purwohedi, “Enhancing lecturer readiness to change: The mediation role of work engagement,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 2290616, 2023.
[33] A. R. Sridadi, A. Eliyana, F. A. Priyandini, A. S. Pratama, S. R. Ajija, and N. L. Mohd Kamil, “Examining antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior: An empirical study in indonesian police context,” Plos one, vol. 18, no. 10, p. e0291815, 2023.
[34] S. C. Bozdo˘gan, “The mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior and voice behavior in the relationship between proactive personality and job performance,” Alanya Akademik Bakıs¸, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1069–1085, 2021.
[35] A. F. Zaman and R. U. Bilal, “Relationship of proactive personality with organizational citizenship behavior: Mediating role of employee job engagement,” Academic Journal of Social Sciences (AJSS), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 333–343, 2021.
[36] R. B. Mathafena and A. Grobler, “Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange in cultivating innovative behaviour in south african organizations,” African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 559–571, 2021.
[37] L. Meria, S. Hidayat, N. D. Santiago, S. Saukani, and S. H. Khotimah, “Blending work values, engagement, and satisfaction to drive ocb in technopreneurial startups,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 324–338, 2024.
[38] C. K. Echebiri and S. Amundsen, “The relationship between leadership styles and employee-driven innovation: the mediating role of leader–member exchange,” in Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, vol. 9, no. 1. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2021, pp. 63–77.
[39] M. Arshad, G. Abid, and F. V. C. Torres, “Impact of prosocial motivation on organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of ethical leadership and leader–member exchange,” Quality & Quantity, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 133–150, 2021.
[40] H. K. Kwan, H. Chen, and R. K. Chiu, “Effects of empowering leadership on followers’ work–family interface,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1403–1436, 2022.
[41] X. Che, Z. Guo, and Q. Chen, “The relationship between k-workers’ leader–member exchange, organizational citizenship behavior and task performance—evidence from chinese hospitals,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, p. 625584, 2021.
[42] H. X. Ho and A. N. H. Le, “Investigating the relationship between benevolent leadership and the organizational citizenship behaviour of academic staff: The mediating role of leader-member exchange,” Management in Education, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 74–84, 2023.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Syamsul Hidayat, Lista Meria, Unggul Purwohedi, Ratna Tri Hari Safariningsih, Fajar Gumilang Kosasih, Sari Budiarti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites while providing bibliographic details that credit its publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online in institutional/disciplinary repositories or on their own websites. Pre-print versions posted online should include a citation and link to the final published version in Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication as soon as the issue is available; post-print versions (including the final publisher's PDF) should include a citation and link to the journal's website.