- Publication Ethics
- Editorial and Editing Process
- Author Fees
- Waiver Policy
- Self-Archiving of Papers Published Open Access
ATT accepts articles in any business-related subjects and any research methodology that meet the standards established for publication in the journal. The primary, but not exclusive, audiences are academicians, graduate students, practitioners, and others interested in business research.
The Journal aims to provide an intellectual and research platform for the dissemination of a range of critical entrepreneurship, innovation, business, and economic development issues and technology impact on entrepreneurship. The primary criterion for publication in ATT is the significant contribution an article makes to the literature in the business area, i.e., the significance and the novelty of the research and the rigor of the paper. The acceptance decision is made based upon an independent review process that provides critically constructive and prompt evaluations of submitted manuscripts. ATT invites manuscripts in the areas:
- Technology and Entrepreneurship
- Marketing Management
- Finance Management
- Strategic Management
- Operation Management
- Human Resource Management
- Knowledge Management
- Management Accounting
- Management Information System
- International Business
- Business Economics
- Business Ethics and Sustainable
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
ATT utilizes double-blind review process for each submitted paper. Please see Editorial and Publishing Cycle for detail on our Peer-Review Policy
ATT Journal document
Articles that are accepted for processing are articles that comply with the specified journal writing framework, which can be found here for more details
Articles that are accepted for processing are articles that have met the journal checklists, for more details, see here
The article review process is divided into 2 stages, review by editor and review by reviewer
The review process by the Editor will involve checking the article writing where the only approved articles are written in accordance with the template
After the article review process by the editor then the article will be processed again to be scanned (plagiarism scan) where the articles that pass the review stage of the Editor are only articles with scanned results
Journals that have passed the review stage by the Editor will be reviewed by 2 reviewers
Articles will be reviewed by a reviewer for a maximum of 14 days of work
Reviewer's assessment process is fully based on the reviewer's assessment
The revision process from reviewers is no later than 7 days after the review results are sent
Submissions of revisions that exceed the specified limit will be automatically rejected
Articles must be original with a plagiarism rate of <20%
The ATT's issues will be published twice a year, every March and September. The submission of a draft of the paper work is welcome anytime, and will be published in the upcoming issue. Every issue there will be 10 papers. In one year, there will be 20 papers. Paper Submission Date: Anytime. Acceptance Notification: 8 Weeks from Submission Date. Online Publication Date: March, September
Aptisi Transaction on Technopreneurship publishes fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. ATT has compile with standar citation I4OC , and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...
This assertion clarifies all parties' moral behavior in the act of publishing an article in Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), including the creators, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the firm Asosiasi Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Indonesia (APTISI).
This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of articles in peer-reviewed Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), is an important building block in developing a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the support agencies. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of ethical behavior expected of all parties involved in the publishing act: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.
Asosiasi Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Indonesia (APTISI) as a journal publisher has taken the role of guardian for all publishing stages very seriously and acknowledges all ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that reprints, advertising, or other commercial revenue does not influence editorial decisions. Also, APTISI and the ATT Editorial Board will assist with communication with other journals and / or publishers if necessary.
Editors at Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT) make a publication decision responsible for deciding which articles should be published in the journal. The decision is based on recommendations from members of journal editorials and reviewers. This journal meets legal requirements that violate slander, violate copyright, and check plagiarism. The editor conferred with the editorial team and made this decision.
The rewrite man and reviewers judge manuscripts for intellectual cognitive operation without esteem to raceway sex intimate predilection faith, ethnical ancestry citizenship, or political ism of the author.
Editors are not allowed to disclose any information about the submitted manuscripts to anyone other than authors, prospective editors, and publishers.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Interest published material, and published in the submitted manuscripts, may not be used by any of the editorial board members alone and may not be in their research.
Duties of Reviewers
1. Contribution To Editorial Decisions
This journal uses a double-blind review process. Editorial leader's advice in making editorial decisions. The editor-in-chief communicates with the author, should be as needed, and assist them in improving their research papers' quality.
Journal editors must be committed to providing timely reviews to authors. If the reviewer is not submitted on time, the paper is immediately sent to another reviewer who meets the requirements.
In content that is still very confidential. Thus the journal uses a double blind process. Except for editor-in-chief, editors and reviewers cannot write papers with other people, including research authors.
4. Standard of Objectivity
Reviewers and editors are required to submit papers based on their content. Then the review comments must respect the author of the study. And reviewers must justify their decisions and recommendations.
5. Acknowledgement of Sources
The reviewer must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the author first. Statements relating to observations, derivations, or previously reported statements must be with relevant citations. And reviewers should also call the editor's attention to any questions or overlaps between the manuscript being considered and other papers being published of which they are personally aware.
6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Information obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts, where those with a conflict of interest resulted from competition, collaborations, or other connections with the author, or anything else related to the research paper.
Duties of Authors
1. Reporting Standards
Each author must submit an accurate report, have an objective, and discuss the research carried out. The data underlying the examination must be presented accurately in the paper because the research must be detailed by embedding sufficient references to enable other researchers to perform citations following applicable regulations. Because statements that are intentionally deceptive or inaccurate are unacceptable and unethical behavior.
2. Data Access and Retention
Authors may be asked to provide raw data connected with the paper for editorial review from the journal publisher. The authors must prepare data relating to the research within a reasonable time.
3. Originality and Plagiarism
The author needs to ensure that the research carried out is entirely original. If the author has used the work and/or sentences of other researchers, this is an excerpt or cited appropriately. Papers found to be involved in plagiarism are automatically firmly rejected.
4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
When a paper is submitted for publication, the author needs to write a statement that the paper has never been published or is currently published by another journal. The simultaneous submission of more than one journal publisher is considered unethical and, therefore, unacceptable.
5. Acknowledgment of Sources
It needs proper and acknowledgment recognized recognition of the work of others. The author must cite publications relating to the current research.
6. Authorship of The Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made significant contributions to the research written in the manuscript. Related authors have the responsibility to continue to send paper to journal publishers with a review process. If the paper is accepted, each author must provide a signed statement that the research work is original and has never been published before.
7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the research being carried out involves hazardous and unusual chemicals, procedures, or equipment inherent in its use, the author should identify and describe this in the paper.
8. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors must disclose any substantive or financial conflict of interest that can be interpreted to affect the paper's results or interpretation. Every source of financial support that exists in a research project must be disclosed.
9. Fundamental Errors In Published Works
When the author finds significant inaccuracies or errors in the work published, the author should immediately inform and cooperate with the journal editor or journal publisher to remove or correct the problem in the paper.
Aptisi Transactions On Technopreneurship (ATT) does not charge to the author :
Article Submission: 0.00 (USD)
the author does not pay article submission fees as part of the submission process of articles in Aptisi Transactions On Technopreneurship (ATT)
Article processing charges (APCs) / Article Publication: 150.00 (USD)
(with PayPal processing fees), is 8% of the amount).
DOI: doi.org/10.34306/att by Crossref
Aptisi Transaction on Technopreneurship Indexed in:
Manuscripts submitted to this journal will be filtered for plagiarism using authenticate applications with a similar level of maximum 20% when published.
The submitted manuscript would be check for plagiarism using by:
All article published in ATT: Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship are Open Access fully funded by University. Open Access Publishing implies that all readers, anywhere in the world, are allowed unrestricted access to full text of article, immediately on publication in ATT. No payment is collected from the readers for accessing and using the articles.
Authors publishing open access are encouraged to deposit the final published PDF in their institutional repository or any suitable subject repository on publication. Authors should provide a link from the deposited version to the URL of the published article on the journal's website; in all cases, the requirement to link to the journal’s website is designed to protect the integrity and authenticity of the scientific record, with the online published version on the journal’s website clearly identified as the definitive version of record.