Teachers Emotional Responses to Critical Incidents in Digital Entrepreneurial Learning Environments
Abstract
In the contemporary edupreneurial ecosystem, optimizing human capital and engineering adaptive Educational Technology (EdTech) architectures demand a mathematical, data-driven understanding of stakeholders' internal emotional and behavioral dynamics. This study examines how secondary school teachers depict their emotions toward critical incidents in classroom discourse by applying an advanced Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) appraisal framework, mapping these dynamics for structural integration into automated affective computing systems. Involving two public Islamic secondary school teachers within a boarding school environment as focal instructional assets, this investigation dissects teachers' emotions toward critical incidents, their cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and the resultant vectors of emotional understanding or misunderstanding across gendered and socio-educational strata. The empirical findings reveal that positive affect structures predominantly map the emotional architecture of the male teacher, whereas negative affect systems characterize the communicative patterns of the female teacher when navigating disruptive critical incidents. These behaviors are heavily conditioned by systemic gender roles and institutional socio-religious capital. Furthermore, while both educators leverage cognitive change (reappraisal) as an emotional regulation strategy, the male teacher operates through exclusive positive affect pathways, whereas the female teacher exhibits a dual-phase response (negative affect transitioning into positive affect), highly mediated by pedagogical tenure and experience. Crucially, the male teacher fosters sustained emotional understanding via positive inclination and happiness systems, whereas the female teacher's discourse reflects severe emotional misunderstanding, characterized by linguistic domination, discourse control, and subtle verbal oppression. This study synthesizes these socio-linguistic dimensions into an Edu-Affective Analytics Framework, presenting actionable technopreneurial recommendations for scaling empathetic AI tutors, deploying automated performance tracking matrices, and optimizing human resource workflows within modern educational enterprises.
Full text article
References
[1] M. Nazari and S. Karimpour, “The role of emotion labor in english language teacher identity construction: An activity theory perspective,” System, vol. 107, p. 102811, 2022.
[2] B. Dreer, “Teachers’ well-being and job satisfaction: The important role of positive emotions in the workplace,” Educational studies, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 61–77, 2024.
[3] R. Bull, L. McFarland, T. Cumming, and S. Wong, “The impact of work-related wellbeing and workplace culture and climate on intention to leave in the early childhood sector,” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, vol. 69, pp. 13–24, 2024.
[4] A. Ricketts, M. Ryu, J. E. Nardo, M. R. S. Tuvilla, and C. G. Love, “Science teaching and learning in linguistically super-diverse multicultural classrooms,” in International handbook of research on multicultural science education. Springer, 2022, pp. 573–599.
[5] P. K. Sah, “Emotions as entanglements: Unpacking teachers’ emotion management and policy negotiation in english-medium instruction programmes,” The Language Learning Journal, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 607–620, 2023.
[6] U. Rahardja, M. Ngadi, R. Budiarto, Q. Aini, M. Hardini, and F. P. Oganda, “Education exchange storage protocol: Transformation into decentralized learning platform,” in Frontiers in Education, vol. 6. Frontiers Media SA, 2021, p. 782969.
[7] J. W. Yip, J. Huang, and M. F. Teng, “Identity and emotion of university english teachers during curriculum reform in china,” Language, Culture and Curriculum, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 421–439, 2022.
[8] J. C. Richards, “Exploring emotions in language teaching,” relc Journal, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 225–239, 2022.
[9] H. Hamsinah, U. Rusilowati, and D. Sunarsi, “Analysis of lecturer competency and knowledge in technopreneurship development of student msmes in pts,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 623–638, 2024, https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v6i3.365.
[10] P. Rautanen, T. Soini, J. Pietarinen, and K. Pyh¨alt¨o, “Correction to: Primary school students’ perceived social support in relation to study engagement,” European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 989–992, 2022.
[11] F. Muehlbacher and G. Hagenauer, “Team teachers’ emotions and their antecedents in the classroom,” European Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 65–83, 2026.
[12] J. Qu and Y. Wang, “Modelling the interaction between efl teachers’ personality traits, emotion regulation strategies, and teachers’ depression: A structural equation approach,” European Journal of Education, vol. 59, no. 4, p. e12727, 2024.
[13] J. Xu, H. Liu, and Y.-T. Huang, “The wolf is coming: How secondary teachers regulate emotional experiences when facing chinese education reform,” Educational Studies, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 749–766, 2023.
[14] N. B. Doyle, J. T. Downer, and S. E. Rimm-Kaufman, “Understanding teachers’ emotion regulation strategies and related teacher and classroom factors,” School Mental Health, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 123–136, 2024.
[15] K. Pithouse-Morgan, “Self-study in teaching and teacher education: Characteristics and contributions,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 119, p. 103880, 2022.
[16] L. Li, X. L. Curdt-Christiansen, and D. Zhu, “Becoming and being a teacher through emotion discourse: A case study of a novice emi teacher,” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, pp. 1–14, 2024.
[17] E. McMain, “Getting good at bad emotion: Teachers resist and reproduce hegemonic positivity in a discourse community,” Critical Studies in Education, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 57–74, 2024.
[18] G. Zhu and F. Lin, “Teachers scaffold student discourse and emotions in knowledge building classrooms,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 3279–3296, 2024.
[19] M. Nazari and S. Karimpour, “Emotions, perspectives, and english language teacher identity construction: A phenomenographic-narrative study,” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 150–168, 2023.
[20] N. Millner, “Unsettling feelings in the classroom: scaffolding pedagogies of discomfort as part of decolonising human geography in higher education,” Journal of Geography in Higher Education, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 805–824, 2023.
[21] L. Meria, C. Yohana, U. Purwohedi, D. Apriliasari et al., “Reinforcing lecturer readiness to change by increasing psychological capital and engagement,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 261–277, 2023, https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v5i3.214.
[22] K. Petrova and J. J. Gross, “The future of emotion regulation research: Broadening our field of view,” Affective Science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 609–616, 2023.
[23] H. Wang, I. Buri´c, M.-L. Chang, and J. J. Gross, “Teachers’ emotion regulation and related environmental, personal, instructional, and well-being factors: A meta-analysis: H. wang et al.” Social psychology of education, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1651–1696, 2023.
[24] K. Ekanayake, “Teachers’ emotion regulation strategies in multicultural classrooms: Insights from finnish teachers,” Master’s thesis, K. Ekanayake, 2024.
[25] M. R. Beneke, M. B. Siuty, and T. Handy, “Emotional geographies of exclusion: Whiteness and ability in teacher education research,” Teachers College Record, vol. 124, no. 7, pp. 105–130, 2022.
[26] U. Rahardja, M. A. Ngadi, A. Sutarman, D. Apriani, and E. A. Nabila, “A mapping study research on blockchain technology in education 4.0,” in 2022 IEEE Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–5.
[27] C. M. Matthiessen, B. Wang, Y. Ma, and I. N. Mwinlaaru, Systemic functional insights on language and linguistics. Springer, 2022.
[28] X. Gu, “Nanjing massacre in chinese and japanese history textbooks: Transitivity and appraisal,” Critical Discourse Studies, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 418–434, 2022.
[29] T. Hadi, S. O. Sihombing, M. Tukiran, and R. C. Wijaya, “Strengthening millennial teachers commitment to become edupreneurs,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 586–597, 2024, https://www.doi.org/10.34306/att.v6i3.474.
[30] M. C. Borba, K. L. O’Halloran, and L. X. Neves, “Multimodality, systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis and production of videos in mathematics education,” in Handbook of cognitive mathematics. Springer, 2022, pp. 909–938.
[31] Z. Xiaoju and R. A. G. Sy, “Contextualizing english language learning: Designing english lesson for students motivation,” International Journal of Economics, Business and Social Science Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 48–101, 2025.
[32] F. A. Rahardja, S.-C. Chen, and U. Rahardja, “Review of behavioral psychology in transition to solar photovoltaics for low-income individuals,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1537, 2022.
[33] A. Maduwinarti, I. A. Mahendra, D. Cahyono, and C. Gusmao, “Technopreneurial strategies using digitalization and innovation to strengthen student loyalty,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 391–404, 2026, https://www.doi.org/10.34306/att.v8i2.693.
[34] J. He, “Positioning and footing in chinese social media news comments: The case of the mercedes car quality dispute,” WORD, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 20–36, 2025.
[35] B. Tjahjono, D. Hermawan, S. Millah, and R. Evans, “Bridging the skills gap curriculum transformation for automation industries and the role of digital technopreneurship,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 650–662, 2025, https://www.doi.org/10.34306/att.v7i2.620.
[36] E. PABLO, “Deciphering patterns of scammed messages using sfl’s interpersonal and experiential metafunctions,” International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 140–157, 2025.
[37] M. E. Poehner and J. P. Lantolf, Sociocultural theory and second language developmental education. Cambridge University Press, 2024.
[38] A. A. Abdelrahim, “Semiotic modes accentuating learners’ metafunctions: The systemic functional approach to multimodal discourse analysis,” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 203–219, 2024.
[39] A. Pambudi, O. Wilson, and J. Zanubiya, “Exploring the synergy of global markets and digital innovation in business growth using smartpls,” IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 106–113, 2024.
[40] M. Monyakane and E. N. Malete, “The application of appraisal theory in maphalla’s poem:‘ditema’,” South African Journal of African Languages, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2023.
[41] S. Imelwaty, F. Gunawan, S. Kuraedah, W. Mardiana, D. E. C. Wardhana, and S. Boulahnane, “Moral values in indonesian primary school thematic textbooks: the marrying of language appraisal and moral foundation theories,” Education 3-13, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 690–702, 2024.
[42] W. Hendrawan, E. T. S. Sujatna, E. Krisnawati, and N. Darmayanti, “Didactic oriented study: Move and transitivity analysis of method, result, and discussion sections in research articles,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1259–1272, 2022.
[43] C. Chen, F. Jin, and W. Chen, “Supervisory feedback on academic writing in higher education a narrative review of theory, methodology, and context,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2026.
[44] S. Suhada, A. Arief, and A. Z. Sarnoto, “Implementations of blended learning from the al-qur’an perspective,” ADI Journal on Recent Innovation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 130–144, 2025.
[45] H. C. Darong, “An sfl perspective on efl textbooks and its pedagogical implications in language teaching,” XLinguae: Scientific Language Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 94–106, 2024.
[46] E. Akda˘g, “Exploring experienced teachers’ attitudes to critical incidents,” Reflective Practice, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 103–117, 2022.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Ika Lusi Kristanti, Bambang Yulianto, Ahmad Munir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.