Developing an Integrative Framework of Technological and Organizational Factors for Knowledge Sharing
Abstract
Drawing upon the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), the Information Systems Success Model, and Social Capital Theory, this research develops an integrative socio-technical framework to explain Knowledge Sharing Behavior (KSB) in the construction consulting sector. Data were collected from 138 executives of construction-consulting firms in East Java, Indonesia, and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The study examines the impact of technological factors (perceived usefulness, system quality, information quality) and organizational factors (normative commitment, shared goals, internal policy, mutual benefit) on KSB, with intention as a mediating variable. The results reveal that technological factors significantly enhance the intention to share knowledge but have no direct effect on actual behavior. In contrast, organizational factors exhibit both direct and indirect influences, underscoring their central role in fostering collaborative knowledge-sharing. These findings highlight the comparative advantage of motivational and cultural drivers embedded in organizational structures over the enabling role of technology. The study contributes to the knowledge management literature by presenting a context-specific model suitable for environments with low digital maturity. It also offers actionable insights for organizations aiming to strengthen collaboration-oriented knowledge strategies through policy, culture, and leadership, particularly in high power-distance settings such as Indonesia’s construction sector.
Full text article
References
[1] J. Hu and S. M. Noor, “Why we share: A systematic review of knowledge-sharing intentions on social media,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 636, 2024.
[2] L. Compagnucci and F. Spigarelli, “Improving knowledge transfer and innovation services: A roadmap for knowledge transfer offices,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 100577, 2024.
[3] F. Pˆınzaru, P. Dobrescu, A. Vit, elar, I. Moldoveanu, and A. S˘aniut, ˘a, “Linking sustainability-driven factors and online knowledge sharing in business: A pls-sem analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 6444, 2023.
[4] Q. Wang and M. Ding, “A study on the impact of digital management on willingness to transfer knowledge in whole-process engineering consulting projects,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 943, 2023.
[5] V. Bloem and N. Salimi, “Role of knowledge management processes within different stages of technological innovation: evidence from biotechnology smes,” Knowledge Management Research & Practice, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 822–836, 2023.
[6] H. Idrees, S. A. Haider, J. Xu, S. Tehseen, and N. Jan, “Impact of knowledge management capabilities on organisational performance in construction firms: the mediating role of innovation,” Measuring Business Excellence, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 322–340, 2023.
[7] T. D. Pham Thi and N. T. Duong, “A study on knowledge sharing behavior among it engineers: An extended theory of planned behavior,” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 2376811, 2022.
[8] J. Xu and W. Wei, “A theoretical review on the role of knowledge sharing and intellectual capital in employees’ innovative behaviors at work,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 10, 2023.
[9] G. Radaelli, M. Mura, N. Spiller, and E. Lettieri, “Social bonding and the multi-professional service teams: a cross-level test of team social capital influence on knowledge sharing,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1112–1126, 2024.
[10] F. Cheng and Y. Yin, “Organizational antecedents and multiple paths of knowledge-sharing behavior of construction project members: evidence from chinese construction enterprises,” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 957–975, 2024.
[11] A. Felix, D. Y. Bernanda, A. S. Kembau, F. Effendy, and R. Nathaniel, “Application-based elementary schools interactive education platform analysis and design,” IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 114–128, 2025.
[12] A. K. Goswami and R. K. Agrawal, “It’sa knowledge centric world! does ethical leadership promote knowledge sharing and knowledge creation? psychological capital as mediator and shared goals as moderator,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 584–612, 2023.
[13] Z. Zamir and D. Kim, “The effect of quality dimensions of information systems on knowledge sharing and user satisfaction,” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2022.
[14] S. G. Abbasi, M. Abbas, and M. A. Ilyas, “Enhancing organizational learning capabilities through digital transformation: Role of perceived organizational support and knowledge oriented leadership,” Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 703–728, 2024.
[15] B. Usman, H. Rianto, and S. Aujirapongpan, “Digital payment adoption: A revisit on the theory of planned behavior among the young generation,” International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 100319, 2025.
[16] A. Kadim, I. Yusnita, A. Sutarman, R. Lesmana, and F. A. Ramahdan, “Assessing the impact of corporate governance and strategic leadership on economic growth and market stability,” IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 177–187, 2025.
[17] Y. Wu, X. Hu, J. Wei, and D. Marinova, “The effects of attitudes toward knowledge sharing, perceived social norms and job autonomy on employees’ knowledge-sharing intentions,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1889–1903, 2023.
[18] R. Lenart-Gansiniec, W. Czakon, and N. Meyer, “Antecedents of researchers’ behavioral intentions to use crowdsourcing in science: a multilevel approach,” Review of Managerial Science, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1411–1445, 2025.
[19] Y. Ismiyanti, S. D. W. Prajanti, C. B. Utomo, E. Handoyo, E. Banowati, I. Kusmaryono, and M. N. Huda, “Technopreneurship enhancing student msmes competitive edge via digital marketing,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 24–36, 2026, https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v8i1.594.
[20] M. Alsqour, H. Attar, M. H. Alibraheem, S. Alsaqoor, and E. Alsaleem, “System quality, information quality, perceived usefulness, and ease of use as determinants of intention to continue using a digital accounting system among jordanian smes,” Engineering Management in Production and Services, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 78–89, 2025.
[21] L. S. Vitente, A. K. S. Ong, and J. D. German, “Assessment of adoption and acceptance of building information modeling for building construction among industries in qatar,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 1433, 2024.
[22] A. F. Eriyawan and C. A. Utama, “The effect of greenwashing on firm performance with multiple directorships as moderating variable,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 74–84, 2026, https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v8i1.606.
[23] U. SindhuVaardini and S. Shanmugapriya, “Evaluating the effective factors of bim for enhancing the construction interface management,” Revista de la construcci´on, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 218–229, 2024.
[24] H. Do, B. Nguyen, and M. Dao, “Social capital and sme innovations: the importance of knowledge combination and customer demands: Do et al.” Small Business Economics, pp. 1–38, 2025.
[25] M. Nguyen, P. Sharma, and A. Malik, “Leadership styles and employee creativity: the interactive impact of online knowledge sharing and organizational innovation,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 631–650, 2024.
[26] M. I. Herdiansyah, A. H. Mirza, D. Abdullah, R. A. Sunarjo, U. Rahardja, and S. Audiah, “Cross-cultural adoption of gamified attendance systems in multinational work environments,” in 2025 4th International Conference on Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–7.
[27] R. Zamani, M. Lari Dashtbayaz, and R. Hesarzadeh, “Factors affecting team performance of external auditors in iran: A delphi–interpretive structural modelling approach,” International Journal of Auditing, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 676–694, 2024.
[28] J. Siswanto, Hendry, U. Rahardja, I. Sembiring, E. Sediyono, K. D. Hartomo, and B. Istiyanto, “Deep learning-based lstm model for number of road accidents prediction,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 3234, no. 1. AIP Publishing LLC, 2025, p. 050004.
[29] T. W. Rafiuddin, N. Lutfiani, A. Rizky, G. P. Cesna et al., “Evaluating the effectiveness of gamification in mobile banking to increase savings rates,” in 2024 2nd International Conference on Technology Innovation and Its Applications (ICTIIA). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6.
[30] C. Lukita, A. W. A. Rahman, I. N. Hikam, and U. Rahardja, “Integrating strategic management with sdg 10 for sustainable development and equity,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 638–649, 2025, https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v7i2.507.
[31] H. Abd El Halim and R. Elbadrawy, “Examining drivers affecting e-learning system quality during covid-19,” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 33, no. 11-12, pp. 1422–1437, 2022.
[32] D. E. E. Saputra, V. Maulida Rahma, A. Eliyana, A. S. Pratama, R. D. Anggraini, N. L. M. Kamil, and I. Ismail, “Do system quality and information quality affect job performance? the mediation role of users’ perceptions,” Plos one, vol. 18, no. 6, p. e0285293, 2023.
[33] T. A. Prasetyo, A. Antonius, and S. Sumirin, “Experimental evaluation of modified t-stub connections for seismic applications,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 125–137, 2026, https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v8i1.635.
[34] H. Kusumah, M. Alghifari, E. S. N. Aisyah, W. N. Wahid, A. Rizky, and A. Adiwijaya, “Leveraging smartpls and ai for educational model optimization,” in 2024 3rd International Conference on Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6.
[35] P. K. Thao, N. N.-D. Phuong, V. T. Phuc, and N. H. Huan, “Organizational commitment and its impact on employee performance in the water supply industry: Dataset from vietnamese state-owned enterprises,” Data in Brief, vol. 52, p. 110029, 2024.
[36] E. Susetyono, D. S. Priyarsono, A. Sukmawati, and P. Nurhayati, “A structural model of risk governance and maturity in ultra microfinance soes,” International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management (IJCITSM), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 156–170, 2025.
[37] G. Gebreyohans, D. T. Croasdell, and M. Meshesha, “Factors predicting knowledge sharing behavior of academic staff,” SINET: Ethiopian Journal of Science, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 30–50, 2023.
[38] X. Liu, L. Bai, X. Leng, Y. Yao, Y. Yang, D. Li, and H. Yin, “Coopetition, exploration and exploitation capabilities, and growth performance in digital healthcare ventures,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 12, p. 1369885, 2024.
[39] S. A. Sibagariang, N. Septiani, and A. Rodriguez, “Enhancing educational management through social media and e-commerce-driven branding,” International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management (IJCITSM), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 235–245, 2025.
[40] S. Chang, C. Qian, B. Chen, C. Qin, and G. Chao, “Fuelling innovation with love: Unravelling the role of companionate love culture and confucian work values in employees’ innovative behaviour,” South African Journal of Business Management, vol. 55, no. 1, p. 4114, 2024.
[41] B. Jiang, T. Kumar, N. Rehman, R. Hameed, M. Kiziloglu, and A. Israr, “Role of psychological contracts in enhancing employee creativity through knowledge sharing: do boundary conditions of organization’s socialization and work-related curiosity matter?” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, p. 834041, 2022.
[42] OECD, “New retail investors in France: Attitudes, Knowledge and Behaviours,” Paris, France, p. 119, 2023, report. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/new-retail-investors-in-france_2cd2565d-en.html
[43] S. L. Zulu, A. Saad, S. Ajayi, and M. Unuigbe, “Determinants of an effective digital transformation in construction organisations: a qualitative investigation,” Built Environment Project and Asset Management, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 896–912, 2023.
[44] D. Chomistriana, A. T. Mulyono et al., “Predicting adoption behaviour to digital government transformation in construction sector.” Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, vol. 29, no. 2, 2024.
[45] Hardi, D. U. Daihani, R. Fitriana, and J. Gunawan, “Business continuity maturity in the banking industry: A governance perspective,” Journal Industrial Servicess, vol. 11, no. 2, 2025.
[46] N. Nguyen Kim and N. Nguyen Thi Hang, “Rewards, knowledge sharing and individual work performance: An empirical study,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2359372, 2024.
[47] T. M. Jackson, J. Shen, and S. Nikolic, “Successfully sharing knowledge: Empirical evidence on the influence of managerial factors,” Knowledge and Process Management, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 309–317, 2022.
[48] F. Xiong, S. Li, W. Zhang, and N. Xu, “Individuals’ capacity to innovate: a literature review of individual absorptive capacity,” Innovation, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 564–584, 2025.
[49] M. M. Naqshbandi, S. Meeran, M. Kim, and F. Mughal, “The role of amo hr practices and knowledge sharing in developing a learning organizational culture: evidence from the united kingdom,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 920–946, 2024.
[50] S. Jin, J. Pei, P. Nian, W. Lu, and S. Wu, “Pay for individual performance and knowledge sharing: A new explanation based on the nonlinear effect,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 189, p. 115161, 2025.
[51] N. L. Nguyen, “Tacit knowledge sharing within project teams: an application of social commitments theory,” VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 43–58, 2024.
[52] S. M. Mwawasi, “Leveraging knowledge sharing to achieve sustainable competitive advantage in organizations,” Journal of Strategic Management, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2022.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhamad Firdaus, Erma Suryani, Reny Nadlifatin, Ahmad Rizki Sridadi, Andika Setia Pratama, Elsen Ronando

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.