TPACK Based Differentiated Problem Posing to Enhance Entrepreneurial Digital Problem Solving
Article Sidebar
-
TPACK Based Differentiated, Problem Solving Model, Motivation, Problem Solving Ability
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of TPACK-based differentiated learning on high school students' problem-solving abilities and motivation. The study, conducted at Private Senior High School PAB 8 Saentis Sei Tuan, used a quasi-experiment method with two classes: the experimental class, which used the differentiated problem solving model based on TPACK, and the control class, which used the conventional school learning model without differentiation. The results of this study indicate that the average post-test score for student problem-solving abilities in the experimental class was higher than in the control class. Statistical testing using two-way ANOVA showed that the problem-solving skills of students taught with the TPACK-based differentiated learning model demonstrated a significant influence between the learning model and motivation on students' problem-solving skills, as well as an interaction between the TPACK based problem posing learning model and motivation in terms of problem-solving skills. These findings have practical implications for educators, providing evidence that the TPACK-based differentiated problem-posing learning model is more effective in improving students' problem solving abilities than the conventional learning model, with learning motivation also playing an essential role in enhancing student problem-solving skills.
Full text article
References
[1] A. A. Setyo, S. W. Pomalato, E. P. Hulukati, T. Machmud, and N. Djafri, “Effectiveness of tpack-based multimodal digital teaching materials for mathematical critical thinking ability,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 1968, 2023.
[2] Y. Kim, “Investigating innovative teaching practices of us entrepreneurship instructors: Inquiry-based, learner-centered, and technology-integrated approaches,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, p. 25151274251388663, 2025.
[3] D. Allcoat, T. Hatchard, F. Azmat, K. Stansfield, D. Watson, and A. von M¨uhlenen, “Education in the digital age: Learning experience in virtual and mixed realities,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 59, no. 5, 2021.
[4] J. Sardi, “Practicality of mobile-based learning with project-based learning approach in electric motor installation to increase student learning motivation,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 1127–1135, 2024.
[5] A. Krisnaresanti, L. R. Naufalin, H. Rokhayati, and F. Fajrianto, “Identifying problems in entrepreneurship learning at vocational high schools: Tpack and sustainable development goals alignment,” in E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 609. EDP Sciences, 2025, p. 05011.
[6] S. Ramdhani, N. A. Nurcahyono, and S. D. Nirmala, “Designing interactive e-modules based on differentiated instruction and the theory of didactical situations for primary mathematics education.” Educational Process: International Journal, vol. 17, p. e2025368, 2025.
[7] O. Gatete, “Revisiting tpack: A critical review and contextual extension for the digital age,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, p. 00472395251382942, 2025.
[8] B. K. Bintoro, N. Lutfiani, D. Julianingsih et al., “Analysis of the effect of service quality on company reputation on purchase decisions for professional recruitment services,” APTISI Trans. Manag, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2023.
[9] A. Ruangkanjanases, A. Khan, O. Sivarak, U. Rahardja, and S.-C. Chen, “Modeling the consumers’ flow experience in e-commerce: The integration of ecm and tam with the antecedents of flow experience,” SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 21582440241258595, 2024.
[10] A. S. Alshamsi, “Integration of transformative leadership, artificial intelligence, and the tpack framework for efficient pedagogy: A documentary analysis,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 995–1019, 2025.
[11] N. Mohammadipour, “Strategic integration of ai chatbots in physics teacher preparation: A tpack-swot analysis of pedagogical, epistemic, and cybersecurity dimensions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14860, 2025.
[12] D. Allcoat, T. Hatchard, F. Azmat, K. Stansfield, D. Watson, and A. von M¨uhlenen, “Education in the digital age: Learning experience in virtual and mixed realities,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 59, no. 5, 2021.
[13] A. N. B. Ling and M. S. Mahmud, “Challenges of teachers when teaching sentence-based mathematics problem-solving skills,” Front Psychol, vol. 13, 2023.
[14] M. T. Hebebci and E. Usta, “The effects of integrated stem education practices on problem solving skills, scientific creativity, and critical thinking dispositions,” Participatory Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 6, 2022.
[15] I. A. Padilla-Escorcia, M. L. Garc´ıa-Rodr´ıguez, and ´A. Aguilar-Gonz´alez, “Mathematics teachers’ knowledge in the use of digital technologies for teaching: Insights from the tpcsk instrument,” International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 20, no. 4, p. em0851, 2025.
[16] A. A. Setyo, S. W. Pomalato, E. P. Hulukati, T. Machmud, and N. Djafri, “Effectiveness of tpack-based multimodal digital teaching materials for mathematical critical thinking ability,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 1968, 2023.
[17] M. Purnomo, W. M. Aimran, and S. Prasitpong, “Implementation of learning with the problem posing method to increase activeness and learning outcomes of physics in the material of temperature and heat,” Schr¨odinger: Journal of Physics Education, vol. 4, no. 3, 2023.
[18] P. M. Silva Le´on, L. E. Cruz Salinas, G. C. Farf´an Chilicaus, G. L. Castro Ijiri, L. K. Chuquitucto Cotrina, F. D. Heredia Llatas, E. V. Ramos Farro˜n´an, and C. P´erez N´ajera, “Digital technologies for young entrepreneurs in latin america: A systematic review of educational innovations (2018–2024),” Social Sciences, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 537, 2025.
[19] Q. Aini, D. Manongga, U. Rahardja, I. Sembiring, and Y.-M. Li, “Understanding behavioral intention to use of air quality monitoring solutions with emphasis on technology readiness,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 1–21, 2024.
[20] S. Baena-Morales, M. S´anchez-Jarque, A. Ferriz-Valero, and A. Bofill-Herrero, “The paradox of experience: generational analysis of ai integration in physical education using the itpack framework,” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, pp. 1–22, 2025.
[21] H. T. Nguyen and Q. N. Pham, “Efl teacher education: Exploring professional growth through the integration of padlet and reflection,” Cuadernos de Investigaci´on Educativa, vol. 16, no. especial, 2025.
[22] E. Khaerunnisa, A. Muhyidin, S. Sjaifuddin, and Y. Yuhana, “Technological pedagogical and content knowledge (tpack) on mathematics learning: A systematic review,” International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 96–106, 2025.
[23] J. Cai, H. Ran, S. Hwang, Y. Ma, J. Han, and F. Muirhead, “Impact of prompts on students’ mathematical problem posing,” Journal of Mathematical Behavior, vol. 72, 2023.
[24] U. Rahardja and Q. Aini, “Evaluating the effectiveness of digital marketing campaigns through conversion rates and engagement levels using anova and chi-square tests,” Journal of Digital Market and Digital Currency, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–45, 2025.
[25] Z. Nonkula, “Student teachers’ narratives on artificial intelligence (ai)-personalised learning in geography and social sciences teaching at a south african university,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. a12–a12, 2025.
[26] H. Almutary and N. AlShammari, “Treatment of depression and poor quality of life through breathing training in hemodialysis patients,” BMC nephrology, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 16, 2025.
[27] R. Fadli, A. Setyo, S. Pomalato, and E. P. Hulukati, “Practicality of mobile-based learning with project-based learning approach in electric motor installation to increase student learning motivation,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 1127–1135, 2024.
[28] V. Dolgopolovas and V. Dagiene, “Competency-based tpack approaches to computational thinking and integrated stem: A conceptual exploration,” Computer applications in engineering education, vol. 32, no. 6, p. e22788, 2024.
[29] Y. Zhao, S. Lin, J. Liu, J. Zhang, and Q. Yu, “Learning contextual factors, student engagement, and problem-solving skills: A chinese perspective,” Soc Behav Pers, vol. 49, no. 2, 2021.
[30] A. Arzak and B. Prahani, “The physics problem-solving skills profile of high school students in elasticity material and the implementation of augmented reality book-assisted pbl model,” Momentum: Physics Education Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, 2023.
[31] D. Cahyono, A. Sijabat, M. B. Panjaitan, D. Julianingsih, and A. Lorenzo, “Challenges and opportunities in implementing big data for small and medium enterprises (smes),” Journal of Computer Science and Technology Application, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 75–83, 2025.
[32] S.-H. Ga, H.-J. Cha, and H.-G. Yoon, “Pre-service elementary teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge in lesson planning and post-lesson reflection discourses on science classes using virtual and augmented reality content,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 171–182, 2025.
[33] X. Chang and Y. Li, ““exploring in a dark continent”: Efl teachers’ pedagogical reasoning and decisions for online teaching from a tpack perspective,” Global Perspectives on Online Education During a Time of Emergency: Conditions, Contexts and Critiques, p. 39, 2025.
[34] A.-L. Max, S. Lukas, and H. Weitzel, “The pedagogical makerspace: Learning opportunity and challenge for prospective teachers’ growth of tpack,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 208–230, 2024.
[35] X. Liu, J. Gu, and J. Xu, “The impact of the design thinking model on pre-service teachers’ creativity self-efficacy, inventive problem-solving skills, and technology-related motivation,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 167–190, 2024.
[36] H. Batool, S. Al-Otaibi, and M. Khan, “Decision making model for evaluation of tpack knowledge constructs as critical success factors for language learning classes,” Heliyon, 2025.
[37] R. Marcos, “Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (tpack) of secondary mathematics teachers: An exploratory sequential mixed methods design,” Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 468–489, 2025.
[38] S. J. Putri and B. K. Prahani, “Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through mobile technology: An analysis of problem-based learning implementation in heat material instruction,” Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1242–1253, 2025.
[39] D. Y. Soetjipto, H. Dinata, N. M. Angga, and J. A. Widjaja, “Development of interactive learning application for basic programming based on technological pedagogical content knowledge framework,” Teknika, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2025.
[40] N. F. Almunawaroh and J. Stekl´acs, “The interplay of secondary efl teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and pedagogical content knowledge with their instructional material use approach orientation,” Heliyon, vol. 11, no. 2, 2025.
[41] H. Moon and J. Cheon, “An investigation of affective factors influencing computational thinking and problem-solving,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 13, no. 10, 2023.
[42] M. H. Saharuddin, M. K. M. Nasir, and M. S. Mahmud, “Exploring teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge in utilising artificial intelligence (ai) for teaching,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 136–151, 2025.
[43] D. Wuisan, J. W. Manurung, C. Wantah, and M. E. Yuliana, “Entrepreneurial self-employment and work engagement in msmes through autonomy and rewards,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 264–281, 2025.
[44] A. Kemp, E. Palmer, P. Strelan, and H. Thompson, “Exploring the specification of educational compatibility of virtual reality within a technology acceptance model,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2022.
[45] D. H. Irawan and M. A. Khoiruman, “Optimization of the use of technology in english learning based on tpack (technological pedagogical content knowledge),” Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3008–3014, 2025.
[46] D. P. Dunggio, R. Uloli, T. Abdjul, M. Yusuf, C. S. Payu, and N. Nurhayati, “Differentiated learning on the topics of temperature and heat to determine the effect of the pbl model on student learning outcomes,” Jurnal Pijar Mipa, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 97–103, 2025.
[47] P. W. Ningsih, D. H. Putri, and A. Purwanto, “Development of student worksheets based on problem-solving of temperature and heat to improve the students problem-solving ability,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 940–950, 2024.
[48] M. Ajeng, A. Kirei, and K. Amanda, “Blockchain technology application for information system security in education,” Blockchain Frontier Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 2023.
[49] V. N. Putri, P. D. Sundari, H. Hufri, and S. Y. Sari, “Physics teaching materials based on the creative problem-solving model with concept maps: The effect on students’ learning outcomes,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1907–1915, 2024.
[50] Y. Kim, “Investigating us entrepreneurship instructors’ critical pedagogy and innovative teaching practice: A mixed method approach,” Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Albany, 2024.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Derlina, Siti Zuhra, Satria Mihardi, Rajo Hasim Lubis, John Tampil Purba, Stephanie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal on personal websites while providing bibliographic details that credit its publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to post their work online in institutional/disciplinary repositories or on their own websites. Pre-print versions posted online should include a citation and link to the final published version in Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication as soon as the issue is available; post-print versions (including the final publisher's PDF) should include a citation and link to the journal's website.