Editorial Policies

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT) accepts articles in any business-related subjects and any research methodology that meet the standards established for publication in the journal. The primary, but not exclusive, audiences are academicians, graduate students, practitioners, and others interested in business research.

The Journal aims to provide an intellectual and research platform for the dissemination of a range of critical entrepreneurship, innovation, business, and economic development issues and technology impact on entrepreneurship. The primary criterion for publication in ATT is the significant contribution an article makes to the literature in the business area, i.e., the significance and the novelty of the research and the rigor of the paper. The acceptance decision is made based upon an independent review process that provides critically constructive and prompt evaluations of submitted manuscripts. ATT invites manuscripts in the areas:

  1. Technology and Entrepreneurship
  2. Blockchain
  3. Marketing Management
  4. Finance Management 
  5. Strategic Management 
  6. Operation Management
  7. Human Resource Management
  8. E-business 
  9. Knowledge Management 
  10. Management Accounting 
  11. Management Information System 
  12. International Business
  13. Business Economics 
  14. Business Ethics and Sustainable

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT) publishes articles following the ATT guidelines and templates. Before reviewing the manuscript, it will be sent to the editorial team to review the suitability of the text with the focus and scope, and style of journal writing guidelines and ATT. All submitted manuscripts will go through a single-blind review process.

  1. Manuscripts will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Single Blind Peer-Review). The reviewer's comments are then sent to the corresponding author for the necessary actions and responses.
  2. Reviewers provide an assessment of the manuscript, which includes originality, scientific contributions, and clarity of presentation.
  3. ATT has four types of decisions: accepted, minor revision, major revision, and rejected.

Publication Frequency

The ATT's issues will be published triannually, every March, July, and November The submission of a draft of the paperwork is welcome anytime and will be published in the upcoming issue. For every issue, there will be 10 papers. In one year, there will be 30 papers. Paper Submission Date: Anytime. Acceptance Notification: 8 Weeks from Submission Date. Online Publication Date: March, July, and November

Open Access Statement

APTISI Transaction on Technopreneurship publishes fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. ATT has compile with standar citation I4OC , and   licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)

You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.

Under the following terms:

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS and CLOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Ethics

APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher (Pandawan Sejahtera Indonesia). This statement is based on the previous COPE’s Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and the current COPE's Core Practices.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of scholarly articles in the Journal of APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), a peer-reviewed journal, plays a pivotal role in establishing a coherent and esteemed knowledge network. This process serves as a direct representation of the authors' work and the institutions endorsing them, contributing to the advancement of scientific understanding. Peer-reviewed articles within ATT serve as a manifestation of the rigorous scientific method. As such, it is imperative to establish and adhere to standardized ethical principles for all stakeholders involved in the publication process: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society at large.

Publisher and Editor

(Pandawan Sejahtera Indonesia) as publisher of Journal of APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT) takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication Decisions: 

The editor of APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play: 

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality: 

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: 

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Complaints Policy: 

We aim to respond to and resolve all complaints quickly and constructively. The procedures to investigate and resolve complaints followed by APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT) aims to be fair and balanced for those making complaints and for those being complained about. The complaint can be made by writing an email. All complaints will be acknowledged within five working days.

Duties of Reviewers:

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:
    Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


  2. Promptness: 
    Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

  3. Confidentiality: 
    Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

  4. Standards of Objectivity: 
    Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

  5. Acknowledgement of Sources: 

    Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

  6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: 

    Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

    1. Reporting Standards: 

      Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

    2. Data Access and Retention: 

      Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

    3. Originality and Plagiarism: 

      The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if they have used the work and/or words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

    4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: 

      An author should not generally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

    5. Acknowledgment of Sources: 
      Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

    6. Authorship of the Paper: 

      Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

    7. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: 
      All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

    8. Fundamental errors in published works: 
      When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Author Fees

APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT):

Article Submission: 0.00 (USD)
the author does not pay article submission fees as part of the submission process of articles in APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT)

Article processing charges (APCs) / Article Publication: 500.00 (USD)
(with PayPal processing fees), is 8% of the amount).

Fees charged include:
  1. Standard first twelve (12) pages of the manuscript. For each additional page, an additional fee of 40 USD per page will be charged.
  2. DOI registration for each paper. 
  3. Checking the similarity of articles by Turnitin; the final result will be sent to the author (on request). 
  4. Layout Editing according to journal templates and standards.

A waiver or partial waiver of author fees may be decided by the editor in case of lack of funding, excessive length of a submitted manuscript or other reasonable reasons provided by the author during the submission. The author should clearly declare that he asks for a waiver in the comments to the Editor box during their submission.

Indexing 

DOI: doi.org/10.34306/att by Crossref

APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship Indexed in:

     

Manuscripts submitted to this journal will be filtered for plagiarism using authenticate applications with a similar level of maximum 30% when published.

The submitted manuscript would be check for plagiarism using by:

                                                         

Self-Archiving of Papers Published Open Access

Authors publishing open access are encouraged to deposit the final published PDF in their institutional repository or any suitable subject repository on publication. Authors should provide a link from the deposited version to the URL of the published article on the journal's website; in all cases, the requirement to link to the journal’s website is designed to protect the integrity and authenticity of the scientific record, with the online published version on the journal’s website clearly identified as the definitive version of record.