Leveraging Technology in Accounting for Entrepreneurial Insight into Government Budgeting Efficiency

Authors

  • Widhy Setyowati STIE Bank BPD Jateng
  • Taufiq Andre Setiyono STIE Bank BPD Jateng
  • Ge Gung EduAward
  • Bunga Novriyanti Bank Negara Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v5i3.340

Keywords:

Performance Accountability, Budget Target Clarity, Reporting System, Accounting Control

Abstract

This research aims to assess the impact of the clarity of budget objectives and reporting systems on government performance accountability, with accounting control serving as a moderating factor. The study was conducted within the Wonosobo Regency Regional Organization. Purposive sampling was employed to select 75 respondents, comprising officials responsible for financial reporting and accountability within their roles, including the Head of Finance, finance staff, and treasurer. Multiple linear regression was utilized for data analysis. Empirical evidence supports the notion that the clarity of budget goals and reporting systems has a positive influence on government agency performance accountability. Through moderation analysis, it was empirically demonstrated that accounting control can act as a moderating variable, negatively affecting the influence of budget goal clarity on agency performance responsibilities. However, accounting control can also serve as a moderating variable, positively affecting the influence of reporting systems on government performance.

References

J. Kang, Z. Diao, and M. T. Zanini, “Business-to-business marketing responses to COVID 19 crisis a business process perspective,” Mark. Intell. Plan., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 454–468, 2021.

S. S. Nudurupati, P. Garengo, and U. S. Bititci, “Impact of the changing business environment on performance measurement and management practices,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 232, p. 107942, 2021.

A. Qasim and F. F. Kharbat, “Blockchain technology, business data analytics, and artificial intelligence Use in the accounting profession and ideas for inclusion into the accounting curriculum,” J. Emerg. Technol. Account., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 107–117, 2020.

T. T. Y. Alabdullah and A. Kanaan-Jebna, “The Mediating Role of Innovation on the Relationship between Supply Chain Management and Company Performance in the Kingdom of Bahrain,” J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Bus., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 160–176, 2023.

A. Di Vaio, R. Hassan, and C. Alavoine, “Data intelligence and analytics A bibliometric analysis of human–Artificial intelligence in public sector decision-making effectiveness,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 174, p. 121201, 2022.

J. Moll and O. Yigitbasioglu, “The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research,” Br. Account. Rev., vol. 51, no. 6, p. 100833, 2019.

U. Rahardja, Q. Aini, D. Manongga, I. Sembiring, and Y. P. A. Sanjaya, “Enhancing Machine Learning with Low Cost P M2. 5 Air Quality Sensor Calibration using Image Processing,” APTISI Transactions on Management, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 201–209, 2023.

U. Rahardja, C. T. Sigalingging, P. O. H. Putra, A. Nizar Hidayanto, and K. Phusavat, “The impact of mobile payment application design and performance attributes on consumer emotions and continuance intention,” SAGE Open, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 215824402311519, 2023.

I. M. Enholm, E. Papagiannidis, P. Mikalef, and J. Krogstie, “Artificial intelligence and business value A literature review,” Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1709–1734, 2022.

T. Ramakrishnan, J. Khuntia, A. Kathuria, and T. J. V Saldanha, “An integrated model of business intelligence & analytics capabilities and organizational performance,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 46, no. 1, p. 31, 2020.

M. Kouhizadeh, Q. Zhu, and J. Sarkis, “Blockchain and the circular economy potential tensions and critical reflections from practice,” Prod. Plan. Control, vol. 31, no. 11–12, pp. 950–966, 2020.

M. A. E.-A. Youssef and H. Mahama, “Does business intelligence mediate the relationship between ERP and management accounting practices?,” J. Account. Organ. Chang., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 686–703, 2021.

U. Rahardja, Q. Aini, N. Puji, L. Santoso, M. Hardini, and A. Edliyanti, “Financial management system integrated by web based payment cash link solution to invent smart reconciliation,” Ieomsociety.org. [Online]. Available: http://www.ieomsociety.org/singapore2021/papers/829.pdf. [Accessed: 24-Nov-2023].

K. Asiaei, N. Bontis, R. Alizadeh, and M. Yaghoubi, “Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 76–93, 2022.

K. D. Dzigbede, S. B. Gehl, and K. Willoughby, “Disaster resiliency of US local governments: Insights to strengthen local response and recovery from the COVID 19 pandemic,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 634–643, 2020.

F. Alkaraan, K. Albitar, K. Hussainey, and V. G. Venkatesh, “Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG),” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 175, p. 121423, 2022.

E. Nica, “Urban big data analytics and sustainable governance networks in integrated smart city planning and management,” Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relations, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 93–106, 2021.

A. Ruangkanjanases, A. Khan, O. Sivarak, U. Rahardja, S.-W. Chien, and S.-C. Chen, “The magic of brand experience A value co-creation perspective of brand equity on short-form video platforms,” Emerg. Sci. J., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1588–1601, 2023.

G. A. Porumbescu, M. Cucciniello, and J. R. Gil-Garcia, “Accounting for citizens when explaining open government effectiveness,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 2, p. 101451, 2020.

C.-L. Chen, Y.-C. Lin, W.-H. Chen, C.-F. Chao, and H. Pandia, “Role of government to enhance digital transformation in small service business,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 1028, 2021.

L. Farinha, J. Lopes, S. Bagchi-Sen, J. R. Sebastião, and J. Oliveira, “Entrepreneurial dynamics and government policies to boost entrepreneurship performance,” Socioecon. Plann. Sci., vol. 72, p. 100950, 2020.

N. Dwijendra et al., “Application of experimental design in optimizing fuel station queuing system,” Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 381–389, 2022.

A. Lutfi, A. L. Al-Khasawneh, M. A. Almaiah, A. Alsyouf, and M. Alrawad, “Business sustainability of small and medium enterprises during the COVID 19 pandemic The role of AIS implementation,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 5362, 2022.

A. M. Levenda and E. Tretter, “The environmentalization of urban entrepreneurialism From technopolis to start-up city,” Environ. Plan. A Econ. Sp., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 490– 509, 2020.

K. Al-Htaybat, K. Hutaibat, and L. von Alberti-Alhtaybat, “Global brain-reflective accounting practices Forms of intellectual capital contributing to value creation and sustainable development,” J. Intellect. Cap., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 733–762, 2019.

L. Rinaldi, “Accounting and the COVID-19 pandemic two years on insights, gaps, and an agenda for future research.,” in Accounting Forum, 2023, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 333–364.

E. Kristoffersen, P. Mikalef, F. Blomsma, and J. Li, “Towards a business analytics capability for the circular economy,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 171, p. 120957, 2021.

U. Rahardja, M. A. Ngadi, R. Budiarto, Q. Aini, M. Hardini, and F. P. Oganda, “Education Exchange Storage Protocol: Transformation into decentralized learning platform,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, 2021.

X. Zhang, M. Husnain, H. Yang, S. Ullah, J. Abbas, and R. Zhang, “Corporate business strategy and tax avoidance culture Moderating role of gender diversity in an emerging economy,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, p. 827553, 2022.

U. Rahardja, T. Hongsuchon, T. Hariguna, and A. Ruangkanjanases, “Understanding impact sustainable intention of S-commerce activities The role of customer experiences, perceived value, and mediation of relationship quality,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 20, p. 11492, 2021.

T. J. V Saldanha, D. Lee, and S. Mithas, “Aligning information technology and business The differential effects of alignment during investment planning, delivery, and change,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1260–1281, 2020.

Alwiyah and D. P. Lazirkha, “The impact of Artificial Intelligence in smart city air purifier systems,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 205–214, 2022.

B. Obrenovic, J. Du, D. Godinic, D. Tsoy, M. A. S. Khan, and I. Jakhongirov, “Sustaining enterprise operations and productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic‘Enterprise Effectiveness and Sustainability Model,’” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 15, p. 5981, 2020.

I. D. Astuti, S. Rajab, and D. Setiyouji, “Cryptocurrency blockchain technology in the digital revolution era,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2022.

U. Awan, S. Shamim, Z. Khan, N. U. Zia, S. M. Shariq, and M. N. Khan, “Big data analytics capability and decision-making: The role of data driven insight on circular economy performance,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 168, p. 120766, 2021.

M. Y. Effendy, E. Nurninawati, and A. Ari Setiyawan, “Design and build A web-based asset management information system at pt Thamrin Telekomunikasi Network,” Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 48–58, 2022.

S. Pankov, V. K. Velamuri, and D. Schneckenberg, “Towards sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems Examining the effect of contextual factors on sustainable entrepreneurial activities in the sharing economy,” Small Bus. Econ., vol. 56, pp. 1073–1095, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-13

How to Cite

Setyowati, W., Setiyono, T. A., Gung, G., & Novriyanti, B. (2023). Leveraging Technology in Accounting for Entrepreneurial Insight into Government Budgeting Efficiency. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), 5(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v5i3.340

Issue

Section

Articles